prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |review
In short, both the tolerance levels (including screening values and MRLs) and the POC residue data on hand must be applied with extreme caution. Even with that being a caveat, it is still important that some level of conservatism be exercised to err on the side of health protection. It is based on this assertion that certain prevention and mitigation strategies are deemed necessary here for fish contamination with POCs. After all, many societies have the tendency to promote better health. There is also the notion that health risk prevention of this type, if effective and appropriate, would help reduce the costly expenses for medical or long-term health cares incurred from illnesses induced through fish contamination and the kind.