home
::: about
::: news
::: links
::: giving
::: contact

events
::: calendar
::: lunchtime
::: annual lecture series
::: conferences

people
::: visiting fellows
::: postdoc fellows
::: senior fellows
::: resident fellows
::: associates

joining
::: visiting fellowships
::: postdoc fellowships
::: senior fellowships
::: resident fellowships
::: associateships

being here
::: visiting
::: the last donut
::: photo album


::: center home >> events >> lunchtime colloquium

lunchtime colloquium

The Center's Lunchtime Colloquium provides a lively forum for resident fellows, visiting fellows, center associates, and other scholars and scientists to make presentations that range from newly minted philosophical ideas to discussions of finished products. This active informal colloquium meets once or twice a week. Visiting fellows are asked to make a lunchtime presentation early in their visit to the center so that others can hear about their research projects and identify colleagues with similar interests.

::: lunchtime 2001-02
::: lunchtime 2002-03
::: lunchtime 2003-04
::: lunchtime 2004-05
::: lunchtime 2005-06
::: lunchtime 2006-07
::: lunchtime 2007-08
::: lunchtime 2008-09
::: lunchtime 2009-10
::: lunchtime 2010-11
::: lunchtime 2011-12
::: lunchtime 2012-13
::: lunchtime 2013-14
::: lunchtime 2014-15
::: lunchtime 2015-16

This Month's Talks :::


April 2016

::: Life Without Definitions
Carol Cleland, Visiting Fellow
U. Colorado-Boulder, Dept. of Philosophy
Tuesday, April 12
12:05 pm
817R Cathedral of Learning

Abstract: The question ‘what is life?’ is foundational to biology and especially important to astrobiologists, who may one day encounter utterly alien life. But how should we answer this question? The most popular strategy among both philosophers and scientists is to define ‘life’. I argue that this strategy is badly flawed on both logical and empirical grounds. What we need to answer the question is not a definition but an empirically adequate scientific theory of life. Yet we are in no position to formulate such a theory. Recent discoveries in molecular biology and biochemistry have revealed that familiar Earth life not only represents a single example but one that could have been at least modestly different in important ways at the molecular level. Moreover it is widely conceded by biochemists that we don’t know how different life could be given chemical and physical conditions very different from those on Earth. The upshot is that life on Earth today provides an empirically inadequate foundation for generalizing about life. The situation is not, however, as hopeless as it may seem. I sketch a strategy for procuring the needed additional examples of life without the guidance of a definition or theory of life, and close with an application to NASA’s fledgling search for extraterrestrial life.



 

 
Revised 4/5/16 - Copyright 2006