prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |review
One method for examining the public health importance of an exposure is the population attributable fraction (PAF). The PAF provides an estimate of the proportion of cases of a disease resulting from a given exposure. In a review of papers on type 2 diabetes, a number of studies did not report the required information for the calculation of PAFs. Among studies with available data, PAFs were calculated and determined to be negligible to moderate, ranging from 0.01 to 0.25 for the lowest birth weight category (cut-off points varied by study). In contrast, being overweight as an adult was associated with PAF of 0.66 for women and 0.56 for men (Boyko EJ. Diabetes Care 2000; 23:1260-1264). The greater relative risk associated with having two risk factors, low birth weight and a high adult weight, would not result in a higher PAF given that a smaller proportion of the population would be exposed to both factors.

The comparison of PAFs associated with a variety of exposures is helpful in characterizing the relative importance of different risk factors in the burden of disease in a given population. It should be noted, however, that PAFs can vary greatly between study populations depending upon the incidence of the exposure. Thus, while intrauterine growth retardation likely plays a less important role than adult obesity, it may have a substantial effect on the development of diabetes in a given population.

prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |review