Teaching Evaluations
University of Pittsburgh (1999-2007)
Millersville University (2005 & 2008)
Kirkwood Community College (2007-2009)
Washigton & Jefferson College (2009-2010)
Washigton & Jefferson College
Courses Taught:
Ger 207 Intermediate German 1 (Third semester German course)
Ger 208 Intermediate German 2 (Fourth semester German course)
Ger/Span/Fre 260 Theory & Technique of Teaching (Teaching methods course for foreign language students)
Fall 2009
|
Ger207-01 |
Ger207-02 |
Ger-208 |
Ger/Span/ |
Mod. |
W&J |
Questions about the Course |
4.8 |
5 |
4.9 |
4.1 |
5 |
5 |
Questions about the Instructor |
5.6 |
5.3 |
5.4 |
4.2 |
5.4 |
5.4 |
The instructor was prepared and well organized. |
5.6 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
4.8 |
5.3 |
5.4 |
The instructor demonstrated an interest in the material. |
5.7 |
5.7 |
6 |
4.6 |
5.8 |
5.7 |
The instructor showed appropriate respect to students in the course. |
5.8 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
4.4 |
5.6 |
5.6 |
The instructor encouraged student engagement/participation. |
5.7 |
5.6 |
5.5 |
4 |
5.7 |
5.4 |
The instructor's feedback (either through written comments or personal dialogue) contributed positively to my learning in this course |
5.4 |
5.1 |
5.3 |
4.5 |
5.3 |
5.1 |
In my overall evaluation, the instructor's effectiveness as a teacher is: |
5.5 |
5.1 |
5.3 |
4.4 |
5.4 |
5.3 |
Spring 2010
|
Ger208-01 |
Ger208-02 |
Mod. |
W&J |
Questions about the Course |
5.5 |
5.3 |
4.9 |
5 |
Questions about the Instructor |
5.9 |
5.7 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
The instructor was prepared and well organized. |
6 |
5.7 |
5.2 |
5.3 |
The instructor demonstrated an interest in the material. |
6 |
5.9 |
5.7 |
5.7 |
The instructor showed appropriate respect to students in the course. |
6 |
5.9 |
5.5 |
5.6 |
The instructor encouraged student engagement/participation. |
6 |
5.7 |
5.6 |
5.4 |
The instructor's feedback (either through written comments or personal dialogue) contributed positively to my learning in this course |
5.7 |
5.8 |
5.1 |
5.1 |
In my overall evaluation, the instructor's effectiveness as a teacher is: |
6 |
5.6 |
5.2 |
5.3 |
Rating scale: 1 (poor or strongly disagree) to 6 (excellent or strongly agree).
Copies of evaluations are available upon request.