home
::: about
::: news
::: links
::: giving
::: contact

events
::: calendar
::: lunchtime
::: annual lecture series
::: conferences

people
::: visiting fellows
::: postdoc fellows
::: senior fellows
::: resident fellows
::: associates

joining
::: visiting fellowships
::: postdoc fellowships
::: senior fellowships
::: resident fellowships
::: associateships

being here
::: visiting
::: the last donut
::: photo album


::: center home >> events >> lunchtime >> 2011-12 >> abstracts

Tuesday, 8 November 2011
Approximation and Idealization: Why the Difference Matters

John D. Norton, CPS / Department of History and Philosophy of Science
University of Pittsburgh
12:05 pm, 817R Cathedral of Learning

::: photos and more

Abstract:  It is proposed that we use the term “approximation” for inexact description of a target system and “idealization” for another system whose properties also provide an inexact description of the target system. Since systems generated by a limiting process can often have quite unexpected, even inconsistent properties, familiar limit processes used in statistical physics can fail to provide idealizations, but merely provide approximations.

 
Revised 11/10/11 - Copyright 2009