University Research Council
2003-2004
Activities Report
COUNCIL CHARGE
Provost Maher delivered the Council charge on
FACULTY ASSISTANCE
Federal Agencies
Trip
Approximately 30 members of the University’s faculty
attended the annual federal agencies’ briefing on March 22. Representatives from NSF, NASA, DOD, and the
Department of Energy, among others, spoke.
The speakers universally recommended that faculty members maintain
regular contact with program officers.
Overall funding is decreasing but projects in computer-related areas and
at the nexus of information technology, biology, and nanotechnology are heavily
funded.
Proposal Writing
George Gopen from
NSF Educational
Programs
Bianca Bernstein, Director of National Science Foundation’s
Division of Graduate Education, visited the University on January 15 to discuss
the NSF’s educational programs. She
concluded that the University, its faculty, and its students could more
aggressively pursue many of the grants and fellowships that her division offers.
Central Research
Development Fund (Small Grants Program)
The Council funded 28 of the 53 Central Research
Development Fund applications. The
Council awarded thirteen grants in the social sciences and humanities, nine
grants in the sciences and engineering, and six grants in the health sciences. Total funding summed to approximately
$365,000.
Electronic Research
Administration
The Office of Research continues to update its electronic
administrative procedures. After
completing this process, the Office will possess a cradle-to-grave proposal
development system; be able to submit proposals to agencies in electronic form;
possess a more efficient system to manage proposal development; and be better
able to capture data from diverse sources.
A Council subcommittee is advising the Office during this process.
National
Preparedness
The University is a member of a consortium that addresses
issues related to national preparedness.
This consortium, entitled the Keystone Alliance, includes
POLICIES
Members
of the
·
It
more clearly defines the rights of the faculty vis-à-vis the University. The default position within the policy is
faculty ownership of the copyright; previously, this position had not been well
defined.
·
Terms
such as “works-for-hire”, “copyrightable works”, and “scholarly works” are now
explicitly defined in an appendix. The
Copyright Committee, which will help adjudicate ownership disputes, also is now
defined in the appendix.
·
References
to potentially copyrightable material have been updated to include newer,
technologically advanced media, particularly in areas related to classroom
technology.
THE OFFICE OF
RESEARCH
The Office of Research is restructuring its operations. Two staffers have been promoted to Assistant
Director, alleviating Mike Crouch, the Office Director, of some of his
administrative responsibilities. He now can
focus on broader questions of research administration policy. The Office soon will hire two staffers to
process clinical and corporate grants and contracts and one staffer to
coordinate research administration. An information
technology expert also has been hired.
This individual is helping the Office of Research develop a system to
process grant proposals electronically.
InfoEd is providing the software that will
form the foundation for this system. The
Other events of note include:
The Office continues to sponsor a series of National
Council of University Research Administrators professional development teleconferences. Teleconferences held this year included:
COUNCIL RETREAT
Members of the Council met on
INFORMATION SESSIONS
Office of Technology
Management
Fran Connell from the Office of Technology Management
(OTM) discussed technology licensing at the University. OTM coordinates the process
through which licensing occurs. A
technology transfer committee evaluates inventions to determine whether they
are patentable. The committee must
determine whether the invention is novel, non-obvious, and useful. In more precise terms, a description of the
invention cannot previously have been published, the invention should not be
obvious to the average person with the inventor’s background and experience,
and at least one specific use for the invention must be known.
The 53rd
Nobel Laureate Meeting
Jonathan van de Geest discussed
his recent trip to
Research Accounting
Caroline Correa and Mark Stofko,
Assistant Director and Director respectively of the Office of Research and Cost
Accounting, spoke about issues related to federal funding of sponsored
research. The federal government
continues to emphasize the need for financial compliance. The University’s business practices related
to sponsored projects have been reviewed in order to strengthen and assure
compliance. Four areas have been
emphasized: effort reporting, direct charging practices, the distinction
between gifts and grants, and residual funds on sponsored awards.
Council on
Government Relations
Kate Phillips, President of the Council on Government
Relations (COGR), addressed the University Research Council. COGR is an association of research
universities whose primary function is to provide advice and information to its
membership and to make certain that federal agencies understand academic
operations and the impact of proposed regulations on colleges and
universities. Ms. Phillips discussed
issues related to academic freedom, research integrity, intellectual property,
and financial accountability.
MEMBERS
|
Chair |
George E. Klinzing, Vice Provost
for Research |
|
|
|
|
Representing the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anne M. Robertson |
|
Faculty of Arts and Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graduate |
|
|
|
David M. Brienza |
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Madison |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan Sereika |
|
|
|
|
Graduate |
|
|
Office of the Provost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John D. Beuthin |
|
University Senate |
Patricia W. Dowling, Medicine |
|
|
Gene W. Gruver, FAS |