|
1
|
- Graphs and Tables
- Part #3
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Explanation of Figure VI-3
- (1) Entry restrictions imposed when firm is in LR equilibrium (has no
effect at that point).
- (2) An increase in market demand occurs because income increases or
population growth occurs.
- (3) Increased demand causes an increase in the market price which creates positive
profits (P > PLR).
- (4) Positive profits would cause new entry but new entry cannot occur
because of the legal entry barriers. These legal entry barriers create
a Welfare Loss as seen in Figure VI-4 (because the supply curve cannot
increase).
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- Source for Table VI-3: E.C. Pasour, Agriculture and the State,
Independent Institute, 1990, p. 65
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
- Source: EC Pasour and Randal Rucker, Plowshares and Pork Barrels,
Independent Institute, 2005, p.
77.
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
- Explanation of Figure VI-9
- PG = Producers’ Gain
- Producers’ Gain is the difference between the Producers’ Surplus (PS’)
with the subsidy and the Producers’ Surplus (PS) without the subsidy
- PS’ = ½ bh = ½(120)($14-$2) = $720
- PS = ½ (80)($10-$2) = $320
- So PG = PS’ – PS = $400
|
|
26
|
- Explanation of Figure VI-9
- CG = Consumers’ Gain
- Consumers’ Gain is the difference between the Consumers’ Surplus (CS’)
with the subsidy and the Consumers’ Surplus (CS) without the subsidy
- CS’ = ½ bh = ½(120)($26-$2) = $1440
- CS = ½ (80)($26-$10) = $640
- So CG = CS’ – CS = $800
|
|
27
|
- Explanation of Figure VI-9
- CG = CS’ – CS = $800
- PG = PS’ – PS = $400
- Cost of Subsidy = (120)($14-$2) = $1440
- Total Gains = PG + CG = $1200
- Total Gains – Cost of Subsidy = Welfare Loss
- WL = $1200 - $1440 = - $240
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
- Explanation of Figure VI-10b
- (1) Since PSUP > PLR, existing firms will now
have positive profits.
- (2) That will attract new entry. New entry will cause costs to rise
(increasing cost industry) but prices do not fall because of the price
floor.
- (3) New entry continues until costs have risen enough to reduce profits
equal to zero. (This occurs at PSUP.)
- (4) Cost of price supports is larger in the LR than the SR.
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
- Source: EC Pasour and Randal Rucker, Plowshares and Pork Barrels,
Independent Institute, 2005, p. 81.
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- Explanation of Figure VII-1.1
- (1) From the average-marginal relationship we note that the AR is
falling (the downward-sloping demand curve) so the MR must be below it.
- (2) Note that as P decreases in the elastic portion of the demand
curve, TR increases so MR is positive. When P decreases in the
inelastic portion of the demand curve, TR falls so MR is negative. Thus
MR = 0 when TR a maximum at the unit elastic point.
- (3) MR curve divides a line from the vertical axis to the demand curve in half.
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
- Explanation of Figure VII-1.4
- (1) Pm < LRAC(Qm) and Pm < ATCm
- (2) Π = TR – TC = Q(AR –ATC) < 0
- (3) Π < 0 and exit in the LR occurs .
- (4) In a constant cost industry, exit will cause an increase in demand
because remaining firms will have a bigger share of the market.
- (5) Demand increases until the demand curve is just tangent to the
LRAC. Since Pm = LRAC(Qm) now Π = 0 and exit
ceases.
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
- Explanation of Figure VII-1.5
- (1) Π = 0 so price searcher in LR equilibrium
- (2) Inefficient because Pm > LRMC(Qm)?
- (3) But this is as good as it gets.
|