prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |review
If growth restriction were one of the primary mechanisms behind congenital malformations, one would expect to find similar sibling-relations for birth weight in families with a growth-restricted malformed infant as for families with a growth-restricted non-malformed infant. Instead we find that in families with a malformed and growth restricted infant, non-malformed siblings’ birth weights are hardly at all affected by the fact that one of the siblings is growth restricted.