prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |review
The information most readily available to identify the impact of disability is found in the administrative databases that characterize cases brought for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) review and decisions on compensation for disability. The PEB review process serves both a medical/disability function and an administrative function. Present PEB reports do not reveal/record causes for disability. Thus, there are limitations to its use for research or surveillance purposes.

A further issue is the difficulty in distinguishing new disability cases in these data systems from cases returning for second and third reviews. This limits the ability to identify the incidence of new injury-related disability and to compare injury-related disability rates among and with the services.

While the data sets of the disability agencies have been developed to serve and administrative function rather than a surveillance function, there is potential for improving their utility for surveillance of injury-related disabilities. The reviews of the PEBs and MEBs have characteristics that make them useful for evaluating the impact of injuries in the military. Adding refinements to these systems would likely enhance their usefulness for injury surveillance.

Go to Comment Form