prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |review
Some people believe that democracies may be better able to respond to this epidemic. This is complicated, however, by the fact that many of the “success stories” – nations that have effectively dealt with HIV/AIDS – are not particularly democratic.

Democratically-elected governments enjoy greater legitimacy than other forms of government, and may be better able to implement difficult or controversial AIDS prevention programs. Public compliance is generally higher in a democratic society… The openness and free speech enjoyed in a democratic society may contribute to greater public awareness about HIV/AIDS. A number of socio-cultural factors related to democracy may also slow the epidemic or mitigate its impact, particularly social cohesion and a strong and vibrant civil society.