prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |review
- An overestimate of true folate intake among Mexican American women would have made effects appear weaker than they were
- The FFQ doesn’t distinguish postconception time from preconception time
- Many women adhere to a healthier diet during pregnancy
- These women may have selectively recalled healthy (folate-rich) foods consumed after the neural tube closed (~1 month postconception) rather than their more relevant preconception intake
- If case and control women misclassified their exposures to the same extent, estimated odds ratios would have been biased towards the null