prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |review

We discussing collaboration with the head editors of the Lancet, BMJ and Nature.  We can easily double the number of top quality articles from developing countries in the Lancet and others. If during the review process the reviewers  identify 100 articles from developing countries that have “lancet worthy” hypotheses but poor methods.  These 100 articles will be triaged by the BA SuperHelp desk, to find the articles where the methods can be readily fixed.  We will then work with the authors to make their methods state of the art. To assure quality control,  the authors will resubmit this to the review.  We believe that at least 15 of the 100 articles will be published, thus doubling the number of articles from developing countries, and maintaining high quality. This is the model we propose for EMHJ to improve the numbers of articles submitted, their quality and impact factor.