front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |36 |37 |38 |review |
1.Do
an IRC and Sutter researcher educational/social activity. Maybe a 2
hour IRC education session to roll out any language changes, form
changes and summarize some of the ongoing “red light” issues from the
previous year.
2. Send
out an annual letter/newsletter to pharmas, research groups and
researchers with summary statistics on our output and turnaround time
and summarizing some of problems that continually came up over the year
with their consent forms, protocols and study designs. No need to
identify any individual or company.
3. Come
up with a way to shift more responsibility for good study design,
protocols and consent forms on to the researcher where it belongs.
Perhaps Sutter should reconsider forming a research assessment group.
SIMR cannot do this with current personnel. A medical writer would be
needed.
|