prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |36 |37 |38 |39 |40 |review

Outbreak investigations are distinct from many other types of epidemiologic studies in several important ways:

- Outbreak investigations are usually retrospective, often relying upon recall of affected persons to identify causal linkages.
- Because they begin without clear hypotheses, outbreak investigations require descriptive studies to generate hypotheses before analytic studies can be conducted.
- Since outbreak investigations are driven by an immediate health concern in the community, the need for responsiveness to community needs and effective risk communication is heightened.
- Outbreak investigations require public health officials to weigh the evidence, often in the absence of a clear etiologic connection, and determine when the data are sufficient to take controversial and sometimes unwelcome actions.
- Outbreak investigations often attain national or international prominence (eg, toxic shock syndrome, E. coli food contamination)