prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |review
1.) demonstrated the civic community to be a significant public policy intervention variable, linking individual with community health status,

2.) provided a basis of comparison for assessing health changes as civic culture and the democratic transformation of Moscow progress, and

3.) illustrated that public policy which is directed at factors that promote civic culture would do much to cement the growth of public health as well.