prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |review
High hazard and high vulnerability conditions combined suggest that impact will be high. Conversely a weak hazard with low vulnerability should result in a low impact. Moderate impact could be expected with either of two combinations – strong hazard and low vulnerability or weak hazard with high vulnerability. Reducing vulnerabilities may have the greatest practical impact with natural hazards, as a vulnerability reduction strategy would move High impact events into the Moderate category (for high vulnerability situations with strong hazards) or into the Low category (for Moderate impact with weak hazards). I would suggest that the reverse is true for human generated hazards.