prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |review
This chart reorganizes the items in alphabetical order, which is no better than the preceding chart for facilitating a clear description of the pattern. Again, the ordering encourages writers to report agreement rates for individual circumstances of abortion rather than teasing out a pattern among all six circumstances.
A second problem is that different researchers might abbreviate the question names differently, resulting in inconsistent alphabetical ordering of the same items. For example, what I called “wants no more” could have been labeled “married, wants no more,” which would place it 4th   rather than 6th in the alphabetical sequence.