prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |review
Traditional narrative reviews, while valuable, are usually subjective in nature and do not follow the criteria listed above. A quantitative systematic review i.e, meta-analysis, follows all four of the above criteria while a qualitative systematic review is limited to the first three criteria because the investigators feel that it’s inappropriate to apply any type of statistical analysis to the data.