prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |review
As a delivery tool, the lecture has received criticism lately as falling short of actively involving the learner. In typical lectures, students begin losing attention after the first ten minutes. The information flows from the instructor to the students, with students frequently writing verbatim what was just heard from the instructor or displayed on the chalkboard. Consequently, lectures have been criticized for proliferating lower level cognitive tasks that entail memorizing information. How, you might ask, does preparing a lecture for the web involve any differences in attention and learning?

The goals of an in-class lecture may be very different from a web lecture. A web lecture can be viewed as an extraction of a class lecture. It can provide an overview of the structure of an upcoming class, prefacing the face-to-face presentation. An instructor can easily ask students to review a web lecture and construct one question that warrants classroom discussion. Or, the lecture can be assigned as a prologue to a class followed by a pre-test on class material, giving the instructor diagnostic information about areas that need clarified or explained further. Because web lectures are easily scanned for key points, they can give students a glimpse of topics that they may want to research further. Web lectures can also provide current information in an abbreviated form prior to journal publication.

prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |review