prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |review
The primary strength of the NIS is that it is standardized between IAPs and therefore allows for state and other IAP comparisons. This has resulted in “informal competition among immunization programs, and has provided positive motivation”.(13) The NIS also allows for a diverse range of studies to be conducted using the survey infrastructure. Additionally, the NIS is rather timely given the short interval between data collection and survey results.