prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |review
Over the past few years, it has become increasingly evident that there is a connection between the phenomenon of post-transcriptional gene silencing and the acquisition of viral immunity by plants. It has long been known that plants can recover from viral infection and become immune to further infection, as shown in the illustration taken from a recent publication from David Baulcombe’s lab. Resistance can be conferred on a plant by a coat protein transgene -- this observation was made quite some time ago by Roger Beachy and his colleagues, as well as other groups -- but the mechanism has remained elusive.
Dougherty’s lab, for example, showed that:
1. Potato virus X resistance could be conferred by expression of a coat gene whose transcript couldn’t be translated, as well as one that could be translated. This implies that it is the RNA and not the protein that is responsible for virus resistance.
2. The most resistant lines had methylated transgenes that were transcribed at high levels, but had a low steady-state transcript level. This is much the same as is observed in post-transcriptional gene silencing or PTGS.