prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35|36 |37 |38 |39 |40 |41 |42 |review
Because the condition I’m talking about is: motor vehicle injuries. We could all get rid of our cars, arrange our lives so that we can walk to work, and use buses, trains and planes, which are much safer than cars, to get everywhere else. But we don’t. We drive and assume the risks - because we value the freedom and independence that our cars give us.
Yet many well informed women at high risk for breast cancer, who decline prophylactic mastectomy because they value their breasts, are made to feel that their choice is irrational. It isn’t fair.
We all do our best to avoid car accidents. Similarly, many high risk women use measures such as tamoxifen and oophorectomy to reduce their risk of breast cancer. But should breast cancer nevertheless develop, they hope that just as wearing a seatbelt significantly reduces the risk of dying in a car accident, screening will lower their risk of dying of breast cancer.