prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |review

This article is an example of a validation and comparative study of ICD-9 and 10 coding performance; the chart review used clinical data and neurovascular imaging reports (75.6% of cases) to provide the gold standard.

 

In the stroke code validation, ICD-10 was not significantly better than ICD-9.