prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |review
The greatest potential for preventing the adverse effects of natural disasters exists during the preimpact phase. There are clear parallels between the concept of preventive medicine and that of disaster mitigation, which is defined as actions taken to reduce the effects of a disaster before it occurs. Thus, during the pre-impact phase, disaster epidemiology involves delineating at-risk populations (vulnerability analysis), assessing the level of emergency preparedness and the flexibility of the existing surveillance systems, educating defined populations at risk, and training health and safety personnel. For example, one cannot prevent an earthquake, however people can be educated about safety planning in case of an earthquake prior to the actual event.

The critical component of any disaster response is the early conduct of a proper damage assessment to identify urgent needs and to determine relief priorities for an affected population

During the post-impact phase, information is also needed on the complicated process of long-term rehabilitation and health services reconstruction. After a disaster, epidemiologic methods can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of health intervention programs. Following an earthquake or other natural or man made disaster, epidemiological studies should be conducted to assess the value of what has been done in the previous stages.

prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |review