prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |review
The hospital claimed that vaccinations were offered free of charge. Letters were sent to the residents and medical students. Double gloving was recommended, yet no lectures were given. The lawyers for the hospital claimed that the risks of viral infection are common knowledge to physicians and it is their responsibility to act accordingly. The court did not accept their explanation and found the hospitals negligent.