prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |review
The second explanation is the buffer hypothesis

According to the buffer hypothesis central elements of adolescence (school, peers, youth culture) and related mechanisms „break“ the traditional SES-barriers and form a buffer form young people against the health-damaging effect of SES.

As children develop, other factors (may) play a more important role in determining adolescent health while the strength of (parent) SES decreases.