| front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35|36 |37 |38 |39 |40 |41 |42 |43 |44 |45 |46 |47 |48 |49 |50 |51|52 |53 |54 |55 |56 |57 |58 |59 |60 |61 |62 |review |
|
The UGDP
trial showed no overall beneficial effect of a sulphonylurea, a giguamide,
nor insulin on MI rates. Both oral drugs had serious potential adverse
outcomes. A two year pilot study by the Veterans Administration (VACSDM) in
sulphonylurea failure, obese Type 2 diabetics showed that intensive therapy
with insulin appeared to have borderline
negative
effect on cardiovascular outcome. The Kumamoto study as previously described
was too small to allow meaningful interpretation, while the DIGAMI study was
a different type of study wherein patients with diabetes and acute
myocardial infarction were treated with insulin infusion from admission and
were followed subsequently for a year. Most of their post hospital discharge
therapy however was not controlled. Nonetheless, a very significant and
continuing benefit was seen for the early insulinization of these patients
at the time of their MI. The DCCT trial described earlier did not have
enough macrovascular events to permit any conclusions to be drawn.
|