prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |review
Very often, E-codes are missing, or not stated in medical records. This creates a huge problem if you want to have a monitoring system to identify injuries from motor vehicle accidents.

Some jurisdictions have now mandated the use of E-codes in hospital records. This is an attempt to improve the accuracy of the medical record in identifying injuries, and many injury researchers have spend a great deal of time on improving the use of E-codes in medical records. Many still are doing so today.

But this raises an interesting debate. As most injury monitoring systems are based upon medical records, the presence of an E-code is very important to identifying and defining injury events. However, for injury research, are we better off trying to improve E-coding, or would it be more worthwhile to use other methods for injury monitoring.