Peer Critique of
Partner’s “Robert Johnson” Draft
I encourage you to refer back to these peer
critique instructions as you revise your own paper over the next week.
When
you turn in your paper February 1st, the final draft should be on
top. It must be over 4 pages (over 1400
words). Next, should be the peer
critique your partner completes for you today in class. This is very important; if you don’t include it, your partner will
get an “F” on her peer critique.
These two documents must be stapled together.
Peer Critique
Instructions: Open
your draft and go to File – Save As… and change File Name to “Peer Critique.” This should preserve your original
draft. Change seats with a partner. Chose a different font or ALL CAPS and type your name in
bold across the top of your partner’s
draft. You want to leave the computer
lab having given your partner much to think about as she revises her
paper. Your performance on this peer
critique is graded.
a) read your partner’s
paper once through
Now, with a different font or ALL CAPS and typing between
your partner’s sentences and at the end of her paper, use prompts “b” through
“e ” to offer her as much helpful feedback as you can. Save often has you work.
b) read her draft again,
this time marking any obvious errors in spelling or grammar and also offering
praise by letting your partner know what she is doing well.
c) at the end of her
draft, pose some questions that will get your partner re-thinking,
re-visioning
this first draft.
d) open your copy of Mystery Train, get out your class notes,
and find the assignment description.
Based on your knowledge of the Robert Johnson chapter, what is missing
from your partner’s draft? Which ideas
could be expanded? Where does her draft
feel weakest or most unclear?
e) point your partner directly
to some specific quotes in Marcus’s text that might help her strengthen her
paper.
IMPORTANT
NOTE: We haven’t yet discussed the critical skills
of summarizing, paraphrasing, quoting,
or avoiding plagiarism when writing
about Marcus’s text. PLEASE read Hacker 52c and 53 a, b, and
c before turning in your own final draft on February 1st.
ALSO, PLEASE look back
to the comments I made on your short paper that you turned in the second week
of class. Apply my corrections and
comments to your revisions of your final Robert Johnson paper.