Department of Anthropology

What makes us different is what makes us human..

Functional Anatomy


View full image

Evolutionary changes in brain growth patterns and resultant skull base morphologies from sharks through humans (yellow arrows denote orientation of spinal cord and the foramen magnum).

Mooney, M., Michael I. Siegel, et al.
2002 Evolutionary changes in the cranial vault and base: establishing the primate form. In Understanding Craniofacial Anomalies: The Etiopathogenesis of Craniosynostoses and Facial Clefting, edited by M. Mooney and M. Siegel, Wiley-Liss, pp. 275-294.


View full image

Midsagittal spatial relationships of the human skull base skeletal elements and articulations in the late fetal period. Anteroposterior growth of the skull base depends on three synchondroses: (1) PSES, (2) MSS, and (3) SOS.


View full photo

The short-faced animal model. Palatal view of cleaned and dried adult skulls of a cat (left), monkey (middle), and chimpanzee (right). Note the U-shaped dental arches and the shortened premaxillae relative to the other palatal components.


View full photo

The long-faced animal model. Palatal view of cleaned and dried adult skulls (from left to right) of the rat, rabbit, dog, and baboon. Note the elongated premaxillae relative to the other palatal components and the reduced incisive foramen (if) in the dog and baboon skulls.


View full photo

The "generic" animal model. Palatal view of cleaned and dried skulls of an adult rabbit (left) and rat (right). Note the elongated premaxillae (pm), the large incisive foramen (if), small maxillary and palatine components, and the V-shaped dental arch.


View full photo

The "phylogenetically-closer" animal model. Lateral (occlusal) view of cleaned and dried skulls of an adult cat (top), dog (middle), and rhesus monkey (bottom). Note the multiple tooth classes, reduced post-canine diastema, and the interlocking "canine complex" in the cat and dog skulls.

Michael I. Siegel and Mark P. Mooney 1990 Appropriate animal models for craniofacial biology. Cleft Palate Journal Vol. 27 (1):18-25.


View full photo

Fitting appropriate animal models. Palatal view of a cleaned and dried adult human (left) and chimpanzee (right) skulls. Note the reduced incisive foramen (if), the U-shaped dental arch and the similarities in relativeproportions of the three palatal-midfacial components.

Michael I. Siegel

Dr. Siegel does research in craniofacial biology, with a clinical specialty in cleft palate and other craniofacial anomalies. He is also interested in functional anatomy, animal models, and physiological adaptation to stress. Among the classes he teaches are courses in functional morphology, anatomy. and research design.

siegel@pitt.edu

Selected Publications

Mooney, M.P., Siegel, M.I.
2004 Animal models for bone tissue engineering of critical-sized defects (CSDs), bone pathologies, and orthopedic disease states. In: Bone Tissue Engineering,edited by Hollinger, J.O. et al., C.R.C. Press, pp. 217-244.

Fellows-Mayle, W., Mitchell, R., Losken, H.W., Bradley, J., Siegel, M.I., Mooney, M.P.
2004 Intracranial pressure changes in craniosynostotic rabbits. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.113:557-565.

Smith, T.D., Bhatnagar, K.P., Shimp, K.L., Kinzinger, J.H., Bonar, C.J., Burrows, A.M., Mooney, M.P., Siegel, M.I.
2003 Ontogenetic characteristics of the vomeronasal organ in Saguinus geoffroyi and Leontopithecus rosalia, with comparisons to other primates. Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop. 2003; 121:342-353.

Top

You are using an older browser that does not support current Web standards. Although this site is viewable in all browsers, it will look much better in a browser that supports Web standards.