home >> lectures>>Pittsburgh Summer Program 1

PSP Logo

Pittsburgh Summer Program 1
A Summer Program in Philosophy of Science for Underrepresented Groups
Center for Philosophy of Science
University of Pittsburgh
July 10 to July 14, 2017


Thought Experiments in Science

John D. Norton


on Wednesday, July 12th

Powerpoint logo
dowload Powerpoint

Please Think About this Problem

Thought experiments in science are remarkable, or at least they appear so. Through them, we can learn about the world, not by conducting a real experiment, but merely by imagining such experiments. This poses the problem that will be the focus of our meeting:

The epistemological problem of thought experiments in science:
How can merely experimenting in thought provide new knowledge of the natural world.

In advance of the meeting, please think about this problem and develop a view. The readings below will help you by showing you how others have approached the problems.

Primary Readings

James Robert Brown and Yiftach Fehige, "Thought Experiments", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

John D. Norton, "Why Thought Experiments Do Not Transcend Empiricism" pp. 44-66 in Christopher Hitchcock (ed.) Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science. Blackwell, 2004. Download

Secondary Readings

At various times, I have written accounts of different thought experiments in physics. Here are links to some of them for you to browse, as your inclinations lead you.

Here's an early survey of several of Einstein's thought experiments (and the first statement of the "argument" view):
"Thought Experiments in Einstein's Work," in Thought Experiments In Science and Philosophy, eds. T. Horowitz, G. J. Massey, Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1991. 

This is one of Einstein's most famous thought experiments and, it turns out, one that is almost invariably misunderdstood. Find out what Einstein was really up to:
"Chasing the Light: Einstein's Most Famous Thought Experiment," Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Science and the Arts, eds., James Robert Brown, Mélanie Frappier and Letitia Meynell, New York: Routledge, 2013. pp. 123-140.

There is, in my view, no doubt as to the worst thought experiment in science, both for its misuse of the medium and the lingering confusion it has caused.
"The Worst Thought Experiment," Prepared for The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. Eds. Michael T. Stuart, James Robert Brown, and Yiftach Fehige.

Just what does it take to build an infinite lottery machine that chooses among an infinity of outcomes without favor? The thought experiment turns out to be much harder and more intriguing than I expected.
"How to Build an Infinite Lottery Machine," European Journal for Philosophy of Science, forthcoming.

For more, see my page on thought experiments.