web tracker Gordon R. Mitchell

Research by Gordon Mitchell

Gordon R. Mitchell is Associate Professor of Communication, Director of the William Pitt Debating Union, and Deputy Director of the Matthew B. Ridgway Center for International Security Studies at the University of Pittsburgh, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where he has worked since 1995. His research program focuses on public argument, rhetoric of science, and social movements, while his feet gravitate toward salsa dancing, stone skipping, and sweep rowing on Pittsburgh's resplendent three rivers.

CV

Electronic copies of documents are provided for individual use for private study or research. To reproduce these publications, permission should be sought unless stated otherwise. Links are welcome.


Books and edited volumes (click thumbnails to magnify)

SocialEpistemologyCover Special double issue of Social Epistemology (April-September 2000) on the AARST Science Policy Forum (guest coedited with Timothy M. O'Donnell) featuring transcript of public debate on global warming: "Is there Sufficient Scientific Evidence which Proves We Should Limit Greenhouse Gas Emissions Because of Climate Change?" between James E. Hansen and Patrick J. Michaels on November 20, 1998 at the National Communication Association Convention in the Green Room of the New York Hilton Hotel • Editors' introduction (coauthored with Timothy M. O'Donnell) • Methodology essay "Fact, Friction, and Political Conviction in Science Policy Controversies" (coauthored with Marcus Paroske) • Content overview (by Timothy M. O'Donnell) • Reaction by James Hansen on the NASA GISS website • Commentary by climate scientist Simon Shackley • Commentary by British Royal Society Fellow John Ziman • Commentary by rhetoricians Phil Wander and Dennis Jaehne. IdeafestProceedingsCover

Proceedings of the First Diversity Recruitment and Retention in Debate Ideafest (University of Pittsburgh Office of the Dean, 1997). Introduction to Ideafest (Melissa Wade and Beth Breger) • Transcript of Therrell High debate video (Rasheed Moss, Krsna Tibbs, Larry Moss, Eric Girault) • Urban Debate League Panel (Edward Lee, Betty Maddox, Larry Moss, Shanara Reid, Krsna Tibbs, Melissa Wade, George Ziegelmueller) • Daniel Webster Project (Laura Heider, Chris Lundberg, Rob Tucker) • IMPACT Coalition and Parliamentary Project (Will Baker and John Meany) • Pittsburgh and Louisville activism (Gordon Mitchell and Ede Warner) • Communication Based Diversity program (Larry Moss, Shanara Reid, Tuna Snider, Melissa Wade) • Small group problem and solution brainstorming (with introduction by Melissa Wade) • Final panel (Sean Banks, Kenya Hansford, Johnny Jester, Edward Lee, Eric Mathes, Krsna Tibbs, Carol Winkler, Bill Newnam).


Journal articles


Ridgway Center

As deputy director of the Matthew B. Ridgway Center for International Security Studies at the University of Pittsburgh, I convene working groups such as the Working Group on Preemptive and Preventive Military Intervention, support Ridgway Center programming, and supervise Security Sweep, Ridgway's weblog (hosted jointly with the Ford Institute for Human Security) Documents relating to the Ridgway Center's Working Group on Preemptive and Preventive Military Intervention are here:

Briefing papers


Newspaper and magazine articles


Schenley Park Debate Authors Working Group (DAWG)

For more on this group, visit the DAWG Blawg. Relevant documents:

Selected public debates directed


Commentary on the 2004 presidential election debates


Commentary on September 11 and beyond


Other assorted publications


Argumentative agency in action

In 1998, I laid out a research program for 'argumentative agency in academic debate.' Debaters occasionally quote my work to leverage their critiques of contest round pedagogy, but as this conference paper from the 2004 Tokyo Argumentation Conference explains, I have no truck with the 'preparatory pedagogy' of switch-side tournament debating, so long as it is leavened meaningfully with applied collaborative projects in public advocacy, public debate, primary research and debate outreach. Such dual level pedagogy checks the 'spectator politics' mentality instilled by an exclusive diet of tournament competition. This view draws from the vision of a 'total forensics program' sketched in Douglas Ehninger and Wayne Brockriede's 1969 classic, Decision by Debate. Below are selected materials on recent collaborative efforts to hone debaters' 'argumentative agency,' - their capacity to contextualize and employ the skills and strategies of argumentative discourse in fields of social action, especially wider spheres of public deliberation:

Miscellaneous debate tidbits


Get Acrobat Reader PDF files best viewed with Acrobat Reader