Excerpt from Jason Bemis's
comprehensive exam [PDF](11/19/1998)
| (1) |
![]() |
| (2) |
|
(3)![]() |
Figure 1 Worm Like chain with fixed bond length and bond angle (109.5), and random dihedral angle |
By definition Cn is unity for freely jointed chains, for other models, such as the worm like chain (WLC), which do not assume that the bond angle is free to rotate, Cn exceeds unity.
Based on viscosity studies conducted by Debye, it is well known that
r2 is related to the radius of gyration by Equation 4.3
In the absence of solvent effects the elastic properties
(4)
of such an ideal chain are given by the Kuhn statistical segment length
(Ak), Equation 5. The entropic force of uniaxial extension
(f) is described by the inverse Langevin function (*), where
(R)
is defined as coth(R)-1/R. R is the extension ratio, the fraction of the
contour length that the polymer is extended. The freely jointed chain is
defined as having a Kuhn length equal to the bond length, Equation 6.
(5)![]() |
(6) |
A more realistic model for many systems
is that of the Freely Rotating Chain, or Worm Like Chain (WLC).
This model assumes that the bond angles are fixed at 180-q,
but are free to rotate, giving rise to a uniform distribution of dihedral
angles. Random conformations were calculated for both models and are shown
below (Figure 2). It is difficult to see the three dimensional effect of
the
| rigid bond angle in the two dimensional figure, so the hypothetical case of restricting the dihedral angle to 0 or 180, to force the molecule into a plane was used to illustrate the two models (Figure 2c and d). The restriction on the bond angle gives rise to Equation 7. In the limit where n® ¥, Cn reduces to C, Equation 8. If n>200 or so Cn is approximately equal to C. The effect of the bond angle and degree of polymerization on Cn is shown in Figure 3. The force of extension for a WLC is given by Equation 9.4 The characteristic length describing the force of extension in the WLC model in is the persistence length (q). This length is defined by Equation 10.5 The persistence length is the sum of the projections of the bonds onto the unit units vector (uo) of the polymer chain. The unit vector of the polymer chain is the vector of the first bond divided by the bond length. Essentially q described how far the polymer extends in a given direction before becoming random. | ![]() |
Figure 2
A: Freely jointed chain in three dimensions B: WLC in three dimensions with a fixed bond angle of 109.5 degrees. C: FJC confined to two dimensions D: WLC confined to two dimensions with a fixed bond angle of 109.5 degrees. |
(7)![]() |
![]() |
(8)![]() |
Figure 3
Cn as a function of degree of polymerization (N) and bond angle (q) |
(9)![]() |
|
(10)![]() |
There are many more polymer stretching theories, such as Rotational Isomeric State (RIS) which places restrictions on the available dihedral angles in the WLC model.6 There are also many theories pertaining to volume exclusion and solvent quality.7,8
The tube model, developed by Edwards and Doi.9-11 This
model describes the polymer as a tube which is free to move within a network
of fixed constraints
References
| 1 | Flory, P.J. In Statistical Mechanics of Chain Molecules, 1969, Interscience Publishers, New York. |
| 2 | Also referred to as the random flight, the random coil, or in the limit n®¥, the Gaussian chain. |
| 3 | Debye, P. J. Chem. Phys. 1946, 14, 636. |
| 4 | Bustamante, C.; Marko, J.; Siggia, E.; Smith, S. Science, 1994, 265, 1599-1600. |
| 5 | Yamakawa, H. In Helical Wormlike Chains in Polymer Solutions, 1997, Springer, New York. |
| 6 | Volkenstein, M. V. In Configurational Statistics of Polymer Chains, 1963, Interscience, New York. |
| 7 | Pincus, P. Macromolecules, 1976, 3, 386-388. |
| 8 | Halperin, A.; Zhulina, E. B. Europhysics letters, 1991, 15, 417-421. Halperin, A.; Zhulina, E. B. Macromolecules, 1991, 24, 5393-5397. |
| 9 | Doi, M.; Edwards, S. F. In The Theory of Polymer Dynamics, 1986, Oxford, Oxford. |
| 10 | Ball, R. C.; Doi, M.; Edwards, S. F.; Warner, M. Polymer, 1981, 22, 1010-1018. |
| 11 | Edwards, S. F.; Vilgis, T. A. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1988, 51, 243-297. |