Analysis of 2005-2006 Salary Offer Survey Results

Sent to IS World March 19, 2006

 

AIS, ISWORLD NET, and the University of Pittsburgh announce the results of last year's MIS Faculty Salary Offer Survey.  This note is becoming a March occurrence, much later than hoped; my apologies. Please continue to provide your 2006-2007 salary offer information at http://www.pitt.edu/~galletta/salsurv.html.  This year has gotten off to a slow start; we need your offer information!

 

Please remember that last year I took some time to recast this report so that it is easier to update each year and is in a more sensible format. Last year I also redefined several categories so that only US and PhD/DBA holders are represented. See the note about this decision below. Those who wish to analyze other categories should note that the numbers are extremely small and few countries are represented. Also, please note that in many countries, educators are seriously underpaid and must take on other jobs to support a family. The high variance could distort the results if all countries are combined without taking appropriate caution.

 

We have again experienced a declining numbers of entries, and the results might not represent all offers in general. Of course, there is a decline in the number of positions, so this does seem consistent with the state of the job market.

 

Please submit your offers, especially if you are a brand new assistant professor.  If you have submitted your offer information and did not see it posted, please let me know.  From time to time I receive a blank survey and wonder if the Unix software malfunctioned.

 

Some definitions are shown below and more are shown at the survey Web site.

 

Bottom line for this year compared against last year (US, PhD-only assistant professor candidates, the largest subgroup):

 

2005-2006: $99,458 in research schools (n=12); 88,773 in teaching schools (n=11)

2004-2005: $98,286 in research schools (n=6); $79,316 in teaching schools (n=19)

2003-2004: $100,448 in research schools (n=29); $86,769 in teaching schools (n=13)

2002-2003: $100,502 in research schools (n=30); $85,500 in teaching schools (n=5)

2001-2002: $ 94,462 in research schools (n=52); $76,882 in teaching schools (n=10)

2000-2001: $ 87,192 in research schools (n=59); $73,647 in teaching schools (n=34)

 

The main focus is on U.S. Assistant Professors, given the numbers, the currency complications, and the situation with many schools outside the U.S. where many professors must supplement their earnings with consulting.  For reporting averages, it makes sense to minimize variance.  If there were enough data points from outside the U.S., I would report many more averages. Note that the sample size continues to be small, so these numbers need to be interpreted with caution.

 

Figures for 2005-2006 show salaries in research schools to be nearly the same as it has been for 4 years. In teaching schools, salaries have gone up a whopping 12%, (from $79,316 to $88,773). The mix continues to be volatile, with the proportion of new positions rising to be about 52% of all positions. Last year there was a severe dip in this proportion, which brought the average overall salary down and highlighted the difficulty in interpreting an overall average for all assistant professors.

The final spreadsheet, in Excel Pivot Table form, is available by going to http://www.milletsoftware.com/Download/SalaryOffers.xls. Thanks to Ido Millet of Penn State Erie for again graciously providing this tool.

The correlation between salaries and teaching load has strengthened again, and is highly significant (at -.494 this year, from -.418 last year; using all data).  The correlation between summer support and teaching load has declined a great deal (to -.197 this year from -.624 last year), indicating that teaching schools are offering more summer support. Teaching loads appear to have increased again in teaching schools but have remained nearly the same in research schools.

 

Results US only PhD/DBA only Assistant Professor:

 

Year

Overall

Research Only

change

Teaching Only

% change

2005-2006

94,348 (n=23)

99,458 (n=12)

+1,172 (+1.2%)

88,773 (n=11)

+9,457 (+12%)

2004-2005

84,423 (N=26)

98,286 (n=6)

- 2,163 (-2.2%)

79,316 (n=19)

- 7,453 (-8.6%)

2003-2004

96,214 (N=34)

100,448 (n=29)

-      53 (-.05%)

86,769 (n=13)

+ 1,269 (1.5%)

2002-2003

98,359 (N=35)

100,502 (n=30)

+ 5,341 (+5.6%)

85,500 (n=5)

+ 6,450 (8.2%)

2001-2002

92,562 (N=62)

95,161 (n=52)

+ 7,962 (+9.1%)

79,050 (n=10)

+ 5,403 (7.3%)

2000-2001

82,244 (N=93)

87,198 (n=59)

 

73,647 (n=34)

 

 

Results for Assistants who Switched Schools (recast this year to USA only, PhD only):

 

Year

Overall

Research Only

Change

Teaching Only

change

2005-2006

97,500 (n=4)

101,667 (n=3)

- 6,833 (-6.3%)

85,000 (n=1)

-4,833 (-5.4%)

2004-2005

100,500 (N=7)

108,500 (n=4)

+22,871 (26.4%)

89,833 (n=3)

+4,875 (5.7%)

2003-2004

85,188 (N=16)

85,875 (n=4)

-14,696 (-14.6%)

84,958 (n=12)

+3,244 (4.0%)

2002-2003

94,286 (N=21)

100,571 (n=14)

+ 1,935 ( 2.0%)

81,714 (n=7)

+ 2,481 (3.1%)

2001-2002

90,770 (N=37)

98,636 (n=22)

+ 8,958 (10.0%)

79,233 (n=15)

+ 1,419 (1.8%)

2000-2001

83,966 (N=27)

89,679 (n=14)

 

77,814 (n=13)

 

 

Results for Associates (recast this year to USA only, PhD only):

 

Year

Overall

Research Only

change

Teaching Only

% change

2005-2006

87,200 (n=5)

91,000 (n=2)

-34,333(-27.4%)

84,667 (n=3)

-10,333 (-10.9%)

2004-2005

121,000 (N=7)

125,333 (n=6)

 

95,000 (n=1)

- 23,333 (-19.7%)

2003-2004

118,333 (N=3)

none (n=0)

 

118,333 (n=3)

+38,133 (47.6%)

2002-2003

89,045 (N=11)

 96,417 (n=6)

-10,271 (-9.6%)

80,200 (n=5)

- 4,467 (-5.2%)

2001-2002

100,682 (N=22)

106,688 (n=16)

+ 2,688 (2.6%)

84,667 (n=6)

+ 3,416 (4.2%)

2000-2001

91,001 (N=14)

104,000 (n=6)

 

81,251 (n=8)

 

 

Results for Summer Support (all)

Year

Overall

Research Only

Proportion

Teaching Only

Proportion

2005-2006

13,251

16,595

14 of 18 (78%)

9,350

12 of 17 (71%)

2004-2005

11,172

15,676

12 of 24 (50%)

7,015

13 of 33 (39%)

2003-2004

15,075

17,929

35 of 44 (80%)

9,525

18 of 33 (55%)

2002-2003

16,246

18,414

53 of 62 (85%)

9,062

16 of 28 (57%)

2001-2002

17,666

19,443

93 of 103 (90%)

11,056

25 of 42 (60%)

2000-2001

13,785

17,365

83 of 93 (89%)

7,182

45 of 66 (68%)

 

Results for Teaching Load, in number of courses (see below) (recast as U.S. only, PhD only)

Year

Overall

Research Only

Teaching Only

2005-2006

5.0

3.6

6.8

2004-2005

5.4

3.8

6.5

2003-2004

4.7

3.7

6.0

2002-2003

4.1

3.6

5.7

2001-2002

4.2

3.7

5.7

2000-2001

4.6

3.6

6.0

 

-.494 Correlation between teaching load and salary

-.197 Correlation between teaching load and summer support

 

A “course” is considered to be in 3-credit equivalents, which counts for 45 nominal class hours (including breaks) times 4=180, or 37.5 teaching hours times 4=150. As before, a maximum teaching load of 4 courses per year defined "research institutions," and those schools above 4 courses per year were labeled "teaching institutions." Even though schools with higher teaching loads often value and even require research productivity, it seems logical to categorize the schools based on this single, explicit, and quantifiable indicator of a school’s support (not just desire) for research. Although it is an imperfect measure, it does capture much of the decision process of candidates, who consider 180 nominal class hours (including breaks) or 150 teaching hours to be the limit for what they consider a research orientation.

This Year’s Survey

This year, we are continuing to allow candidates to choose either an anonymous or non-anonymous (only to Dennis) entry.

Anonymous submissions are certainly appreciated, but in the past some deans stated that they did not wish to pay attention to anonymous data. It seems that we need a substantial body of verified/verifiable data for extending the impact of the survey. A non-anonymous entry will simply have a "yes" in the "identity revealed?" column as before.

We hope you find the results from last year interesting and useful, and that we receive a larger number of submissions this year, especially with identities revealed!

Dennis Galletta
Page Editor: Salary Survey