Another goal of the research is to understand how the results may extend beyond the domain of language. An advantage of functional imaging studies is that activity in the brain can be examined without a priori restrictions upon the regions of interest. This allows connections to be made between different types of cognitive processes which otherwise might not be apparent. For example, neuroimaging studies in normals and behavioral studies in brain-damaged patients have provided evidence that the cerebellum (traditionally considered to be a purely motor structure) is involved in the performance and learning of a variety of nonmotor tasks, including certain types of language tasks.
Members of the lab will have the opportunity to draw upon literature from multiple disciplines (e.g., psychology, neuroscience, computer science) when designing and interpreting experiments. Specific research projects may involve several different methodologies, including neuroimaging (PET and fMRI), lesion-behavior analysis, and the behavioral investigation of normal subjects. Finally, interactions and collaborations within the larger cognitive neuroscience community are encouraged.
Raichle ME, JA Fiez, TO Videen, PT Fox, JV Pardo, AK MacLeod, and SE Petersen (1994). Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during non-motor learning. Cerebral Cortex, 4:8-26.
Fiez JA, P Tallal, ME Raichle, WF Katz, FM Miezin, and SE Petersen (1995). PET studies of auditory and phonological processing: Effects of stimulus type and task condition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7:357-375.
Fiez JA, EA Raife, DA Balota, ME Raichle, and SE Petersen (1996). A PET study of verbal working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 16:808- 822.
Fiez JA and D Tranel (1996). A standardized set of 280 stimuli depicting actions and events: Measures of name agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image agreement, and conceptual knowledge. Memory and Cognition, in press.