Comparison of rule-based and Bayesian network approaches in medical
diagnostic systems
- Authors:
-
Agnieszka Onisko
Bialystok University of Technology
Institute of Computer Science
Bialystok, 15-351, Poland
e-mail:
aonisko@ii.pb.bialystok.pl
-
Peter Lucas
Department of Computing Science
University of Aberdeen
Aberdeen AB24 3UE
Scotland, UK
e-mail:
plucas@csd.abdn.ac.uk
-
Marek J. Druzdzel
Decision Systems Laboratory
School of Information Sciences
and
Intelligent Systems Program
University of Pittsburgh
e-mail: marek@sis.pitt.edu
-
Abstract:
Almost two decades after the introduction of probabilistic expert
systems, their theoretical status, practical use, and experiences
are matching those of rule-based expert systems.
Since both types of systems are in wide use, it is more than ever
important to understand their advantages and drawbacks.
We describe a study in which we compare rule-based systems to
systems based on Bayesian networks.
We present two expert systems for diagnosis of liver disorders that
served as the inspiration and vehicle of our study and discuss problems
related to knowledge engineering using the two approaches.
We finally present the results of a simple experiment comparing the
diagnostic performance of each of the systems on a subset of their domain.
The full paper is available in
PostScript (477KB)
and
PDF (212KB)
formats.
Back to list of publications
Back to Marek's home page
marek@sis.pitt.edu /
Last update: 14 May 2005