ALCTS/CCS/SAC Subcommittee on Form Headings/Subdivisions Implementation

Form/Genre Thesaurus Questionnaire -- Preliminary Results


January 15, 1998


In December of 1996 members of the Subcommittee on Form Headings/Subdivisions Implementation distributed two questionnaires regarding form/genre terminology. The one with which this report deals was sent to a small sampling of thesaurus developers asking about their recording of or plans to record form/genre terms. The other was distributed on the US-MARC list to collect information on the status of system changes in regards to the 655 field and 6XX $v USMARC field designations. Preliminary results of both questionnaires were discussed at the Subcommittee's open meeting on February 14, 1996.

SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF THESAURUS QUESTIONNAIRE: Original responses from 10 thesaurus developers (and one response from a database representative) were received, indicating a range of approaches to collecting and treating form/genre terminology and in prescribing or observing the application of that terminology in either USMARC or non-MARC records. After the 2/14/96 meeting, one updated and one additional response were received. [Remarks from these respondents are characterized and tallied in the following results.] Several respondents indicated a need to clarify and standardize the purpose and nature of access by form/genre.

These preliminary results provide insight into the benefits of:

1) coordination among thesuaurus developers in collecting, naming, defining, and categorizing of form/genre terminology

2) standardization of how form/genre terminology is applied in USMARC and non-MARC databases

3) incorporation of system changes to support sophisticated search strategies and retrieval displays for form/genre terminology

4) education of users regarding the distinction between form/genre and topical access and the manner in which such searches can be effectively executed.

Below is a list of questions IN CAPS sent to thesaurus developers. Responses (indented and in lowercase) are described in more detail than in the summary above. Discrepancies in numbers are due to the fact that not all respondents answered all questions and some questions had more than one possible answer.

1. WHO ARE YOU?

     Art & Architecture Thesaurus (AAT)
     CAB Thesaurus (Slough [England]: Commonwealth Agricultural
          Bureaux)
     Catholic Subject Headings
     Defense Technical Information Center Thesuaurus
     ERIC Thesaurus
     General Accounting Offices (GAO) Thesaurus
     Guidelines on Subject Access to Individual Works of Fiction,
       Drama, Etc. (GSAFD)
     NASA Thesaurus
     RBMS Thesauri (Binding terms, Genre terms, Paper terms,
      Printing & Publishing evidence, Provenance evidence, Type
      evidence
     LC Thesaurus for Graphic Materials, 2nd ed. (TGM II)
     Transportation Library Subject Thesaurus
     __________
     
     English Short Title Catalogue (a database; not a thesaurus)

2. IS THERE A FORM/GENRE FACET OR LIST (OR ITS EQUIVALENT)
IN YOUR THESAURUS?  IF YES, WHAT IS IT CALLED?  IF NO, DO YOU
HAVE PLANS TO CREATE SUCH A FACET OR LIST?

     Yes: 7

     Various names applied: publication/document type
                            Form subheading
                            Information Forms facet
                            Visual Works facet
                            all thesauri included in RBMS
                            complete TGM II
     No separate list: 5

     Will create list: 1     


3. ARE TERMS FROM YOUR FORM/GENRE LIST USED IN USMARC CATALOGING
RECORDS?  IF YES, IN WHAT FIELD ARE THEY CODED (650, 655, OTHER)?
          
     some used in more than one field, including: 
        008, 650, 655, 755

     650: 3
     655: 5

     MARC not used: 4


4. IF FORM/GENRE TERMS ARE USED IN CATALOGING RECORDS OTHER THAN
USMARC, BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THEIR USE.

     Fields used: publication type field and/or codes for
                     pubtypes
                  object type, classification, subcategory
                  type of work
                  controlled terms that match type of record
                  identifier field
                  acquisitions series

     Types of records used: archival, museum, visual resource
                              communities, pictorial material, 
                              patents, book dealers

5. BY WHAT MEANS CAN A USER SEARCH FOR THESE TERMS? (ACCESS PRINT
VERSION OF THESAURUS/LIST; ACCESS THESAURUS/LIST ONLINE; ACCESS
TERMS THROUGH ONLINE KEYWORD SEARCH, SUBJECT KEYWORD, OR
FORM/GENRE KEYWORD SEARCH)

     print list: 9
     online list: 5
     
     keyword search: 6
     subject/descriptor keyword search: 8
     form/genre (term and/or code, or id) keyword search: 4

6. ARE MACHINE-READABLE AUTHORITY CONTROL RECORDS AVAILABLE FROM
YOU OR ANOTHER SOURCE FOR YOUR FORM/GENRE TERMS?  IF AVAILABLE
NOW, ARE THEY IN THE USMARC FORMAT AND CAN THEY BE DISTRIBUTED TO
THE BIBLIOGRAPHIC COMMUNITY?  IF NOT AVAILABLE AT THE PRESENT
TIME, PLEASE LET US KNOW IF THERE ARE ANY FUTURE PLANS FOR SUCH
DISTRIBUTION.

     MARC authority records available 
          Yes: 2
           No: 5

     can authority records be distributed
          Yes: 1

     plans for future distribution
          Yes: 1
           No: 5

7. WHAT DO YOU ENVISION AS AN IDEAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE DISPLAY
AND SEARCHING OF FORM/GENRE TERMS IN YOUR THESAURUS?

     satisfied with current situation

     development/useage not under consideration

     use only as qualifying terms

     allow users to access thesaurus from behind catalog
       database, browse thesaurus and then cut and paste
       selected descriptors into appropriate field
     
     greater use of syndetic structure of thesaurus
       to enhance retrieval

     add definitions and scope notes

     make thesaurus widely available, such as through WWW

     integration of multiple thesauri


8. CAN YOU SUGGEST ANY SPECIFIC AREAS OF RESEARCH AND POSSIBLE
FUNDING THAT WOULD IMPROVE THE AVAILABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF
FORM/GENRE VOCABULARY IN DATABASES?

     standardization of terminology

     provide over-all scheme for terminology

     universalization of form/genre distinction in LCSH

     user education to help predict what will be retrieved
          via a subject search as distinguished from what will
          be retrieved via a form/genre search
     
     see also, answers for question 7


9. CAN SOME OR ALL OF YOUR RESPONSE BE POSTED ON WEB PAGES
MAINTAINED BY A MEMBER OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE?  THESE WEB PAGES WILL
BE PUBLICIZED WITHIN THE BIBLIOGRAPHIC COMMUNITY IN ORDER TO
IMPROVE COMMUNICATION AND EDUCATION ON FORM/GENRE ISSUES AND
PROGRESS. (SEE CURRENT WEB PAGES:
http://www.pitt.edu/~agtaylor/ala/alac.htm)

     AAT
     Catholic Subject Headings
     Defense Technology Thesaurus
     ERIC
     GAO Thesaurus
     Guidelines on Subject Access to Individual Works of Fiction, Drama, Etc.
     NASA Thesaurus
     RBMS Thesauri
     TGM II
     Transportation Thesaurus


FROM:          Harriette Hemmasi           Mary Charles Lasater
               Rutgers University          Authorities Coordinator
               New Brunswick, NJ           Vanderbilt University