UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PROCEDURE  \  02-03-03



CATEGORY:                  ACADEMIC AFFAIRS
SECTION:                   Academic Integrity
SUBJECT:                   Student Obligations and Adjudication
                           for Alleged Violations
EFFECTIVE DATE:            August 10, 1988



I.      PURPOSE

        To provide the guidelines for adjudication for alleged student
        breach of academic integrity.

II.     SCOPE

        This procedure applies to all matters in which a faculty
        member intends to penalize a student based upon an alleged
        breach of academic integrity.

III.    ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES

        The Administrative Officer designated within the individual
        academic unit to oversee matters of academic integrity, upon
        receiving a statement of charges from a faculty member,
        notifies the student and the hearing authority.

        The School Academic Integrity Hearing Board is composed of
        both faculty and students, the number of which, manner and
        criteria of selection, terms of service, and other related
        organizational matters will be determined by the individual
        academic unit.

        The Dean or Campus President issues the final decision.

        Timeliness  It is the responsibility of all parties, including
        administrative officers, to take prompt action in order that
        charges can be resolved quickly and fairly.  Failure of the
        instructor to utilize these procedures diligently may
        constitute grounds for dismissal of charges.  Parties have
        the right to seek review of the Provost or to petition the
        University Review Board for an appeal from a decision of an
        academic integrity hearing board or investigatory committee
        within five (5) working days of the date of the decision
        letter.

IV.     PROCEDURE

        Responsibility        Action

        Instructor           1. Advise the student that there is
                                reason to believe that the student
                                has committed an offense related to
                                academic integrity.

                                a. The student will be afforded at
                                   least an informal opportunity to
                                   respond.

                                b. If a specific resolution offered by
                                   either student or faculty member
                                   is accepted, the matter will be
                                   considered closed if both parties
                                   sign a written agreement to that
                                   effect and submit it to the dean's
                                   office.

                             2. If a resolution cannot be reached,
                                file a written statement of charges
                                with the designated academic
                                integrity hearing officer.

                                a. If this happens at the end of the
                                   term, issue a "G" grade for the
                                   course until the matter is
                                   resolved.

        Designated Administrative
        Officer              3. Transmit the charges to the student,
                                together with a copy of the
                                University of Pittsburgh Guidelines
                                on Academic Integrity.

                                a. The letter of transmittal to the
                                   student will state the time and
                                   place when a hearing on the
                                   charges will be held.

                             4. Send to the instructor a copy of the
                                above letter.

        Hearing Authority    5. Provide a fair inquiry into the truth
                                or falsity of the charges

                                a. The charged party and the
                                   instructor will be afforded the
                                   right to cross-examine

                                b. At the level of the school academic
                                   integrity hearing, extramural
                                   legal counsel is not permitted,
                                   but a representative from within
                                   the University community is
                                   permitted for both faculty and
                                   students

                             6. Maintain a suitable record of the
                                proceedings, exclusive of
                                deliberations to arrive at a
                                decision.

                             7. Determine whether the charges have
                                been proved by clear and convincing
                                evidence, together with findings with
                                respect to the material facts.  If
                                any charges are established, the
                                decision should state the particular
                                sanction or sanctions to be imposed.

                             8. Submit the decision in writing to the
                                dean/campus president.

        Dean/Campus
        President            9. Make an independent review of the
                                hearing proceedings.

                                a. When deemed necessary, require that
                                   the charges be dismissed, or that
                                   the case be remanded for further
                                   proceedings.

                            10. Issue a final decision upon completion
                                of any additional proceedings.

                                a. The dean/campus president may
                                   reject any findings made by the
                                   hearing authority adverse to the
                                   student, and may dismiss the
                                   charges or reduce the severity of
                                   any sanction imposed.

                                b. The dean/campus president may not
                                   make new findings adverse to the
                                   student or increase the severity
                                   of a sanction, except in the case
                                   of repeating offenders who have
                                   been previously found in violation
                                   of the Academic Integrity
                                   Guidelines through formal hearing
                                   procedures.

        Designated Administrative
        Officer             11. Transmit to the charged party and the
                                instructor copies of all actions
                                taken by the hearing authority and
                                the dean/campus president.

                                a. If a sanction is imposed, the
                                   notice to the student will make
                                   reference to the student's
                                   opportunity, by petition files
                                   with the provost, to appeal to the
                                   University Review Board on matters
                                   within its jurisdiction and scope
                                   of review.  See Policy 02-03-05,
                                   University Review Board.

V.      REFERENCES

        -    Policy 02-03-03, Student Obligations and Adjudication for
             Alleged Violations.

        -    Policy 02-03-05, University Review Board.

        -    Procedure 02-03-05, University Review Board.