John
D. Norton
|
||
| home >> research >> more philosophy of science | ||
| While it is common to invoke non-standard logics to explain how scientists avoid the logical anarchy that threatens in logically inconsistent theories, I have argued that this "logic-driven" approach does not match that of the practising scientists and defend a "content-driven" approach instead. | "The Logical Inconsistency of the Old Quantum Theory
of Black Body Radiation," Philosophy of Science, 54 ,
pp. 327-350. "A Paradox in Newtonian Cosmology" pp.412-20 in M. Forbes , D. Hull and K. Okruhlik (eds.) PSA 1992: Proceedings of the 1992 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 1993. (Revised version "A Paradox in Newtonian Cosmology II" in J. Meheus, ed., Inconsistency in Science. Kluwer, 2002.) |
|
|
That we only have memories of the past is enormously suggestive, but I have urged that it tells us very little about the fundamental laws of nature. | "What can we Learn About Physical Laws from the Fact
that We Have Memories Only of the Past?," International Studies in
the Philosophy of Science. 14 (2000), pp. 11-23. Download |
| I have laid out a solution of the "two envelope paradox." A failure of uniform convergence of an infinite series gives the illusion of the viability of multiple arguments to contradictory conclusions. | "When the Sum of Our Expectations Fails Us: The
Exchange Paradox." Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 78 (1998),
pp.34-58. Download. |
|